
On Tuesday 17th November 2008 received letter in post saying I had been accepted into the Higher Education Academy (HEA) - based in York, UK.
Story
Around four years ago in 2004 I wanted to join the HEA as an Associate Practitioner (that is someone that is involved with supporting teaching and learning at a Higher Education Institute - HEI). I thought the best approach was to undertake a process being run by Professional Development (PD) at Loughborough University called 'the Associate Pathway'. This involved attending a number of seminars and workshops in PD and was designed for new teaching staff.
My background as having a degree in Human Psychology, involved with teaching support, and membership of the British Psychological Society seemed a good indicator if I could sustain the amount of work needed for this 'pathway'. Unfortunately the amount of time and effort with the pathway and the assessments that were needed meant I was encouraged to proceed through another route called 'the individual route'. This was a long document 18 page that was broken down into six key aeas of teaching support and student learning that was if anything as challenging as the 'associate pathway' itself. I started to 'work on it' bit by bit as I thought through how best to provide evidence for the 'associate' status I sought.
Therefore I undertook a number of side related courses to enhance my skill base which included, Introduction to Counselling Skills at Leicester University (2005), the Open Network College Macmillan Cancer Support Certificate (2006-7) which included communication skills, purpose of feedback, healthy life-style and wellbeing modules and then the Institute of Leadership and Management (ILM) award of 'Coaching in the Workplace' (2008).
Also I attended as many internal/external PD courses that were offered and undertook a number of internal and external web based on-line surveys that impinged in my work areas (e.g. 'Resources and courses for staff and students' (2006) was cited at the Teesside University in the summer of 2006 (for the Association of Technical Staffs in Psychology - ATSiP) as a reason for my nomination and recognition by HEA as the first ever National Technician/Demonstrator Award which is now an annual award given to those technical staff that are providing excellence in terms of teaching and learning support in their departments at HEIs.
Next?
Well by 2007 I thought I had enough documentation to fulfil the Associate Practitioner Status. I spoke with a member of staff in PD and she said 'I had more than enough' and pointed out I should be able to go for 'Fellow' Status. At first I thought 'no way' but little by little I started to put information into the questions that I had thought were not originally possible. Even then I doubted I had 'the right stuff' as they say.
However, as I knew that to fulfil the next higher criteria I had to be really 'full on' with the information; I sought to write up my responses to each section with cited evidence/references and constructive well thought out answers. Then around June 2008 I knew that the categories that had fazed me previously were really just another 'bar' to jump higher and I was highly satisfied with the result.
One final talk with PD and to find suitable referees to support the application I put the application form in the post July 17th 2008. A long wait ensured and 4 months later after a HEA peer group panel meeting was told I had the coveted Fellow status. (See postscript later for differences in criteria of Associate/Fellow Status)
Feelings?
Well its been so long I thought it was not going to hit me, but it did. I had to inform everyone involved in the process and have now FHEA (Fellow Higher Education Academy) after my BSc.
Also my other ATSiP members have been interested in what does it mean?
1. Accreditation to the HEA is like a gold standard - peer reviewed, strict criteria for entry, accepted by other HEIs as something highly regarded
2. Enhances ones' CV as it shows that you have sought continual professional development and been successful.
3. Perhaps the first time a technical member of staff has received this recognition.
4. This FHEA is a statement, reflective assessment, directional pointer, almost a dissertation that can summarise the work experiences I have experienced over the 21 years I have been at Loughborough University. is there more? Oh yes watch this space!!!!
Postscript
Recognition Criteria of HEA The Professional Recognition Scheme is aligned with the UK Professional Standards Framework for teaching and supporting learning in higher education (UK PSF). The UK PSF consists of three Standard Descriptors (SD):
SD1: Demonstrates an understanding of the student learning experience through engagement with at least two of the six areas of activity, appropriate core knowledge and professional values; the ability to engage in practices related to those areas of activity; the ability to incorporate research, scholarship and/or professional practice into those activities = Associate Status
SD2: Demonstrates an understanding of the student learning experience through engagement with all areas of activity, core knowledge and professional values; the ability to engage in practices related to all areas of activity; the ability to incorporate research, scholarship and/or professional practice into those activities = Fellow Status
SD3: Supports and promotes student learning in all areas of activity, core knowledge and professional values through mentoring and leading individuals and/or teams; incorporates research, scholarship and/or professional practice into those activities = Senior Fellow Status The Standard Descriptors are underpinned by the following areas of activity, core knowledge and professional values.
Areas of activity
1. Design and planning of learning activities and/or programmes of study
2. Teaching and/or supporting student learning
3. Assessment and giving feedback to learners
4. Developing effective environments and student support and guidance
5. Integration of scholarship, research and professional activities with teaching and supporting learning
6. Evaluation of practice and continuing professional development Core knowledge Knowledge and understanding of:
1. The subject material
2. Appropriate methods for teaching and learning in the subject area and at the level of the academic programme
3. How students learn, both generally and in the subject
4. The use of appropriate learning technologies
5. Methods for evaluating the effectiveness of teaching
6. The implications of quality assurance and enhancement for professional practice
Professional values
1. Respect for individual learners
2. Commitment to incorporating the process and outcomes of relevant research, scholarship and/or professional practice
3. Commitment to the development of learning communities
4. Commitment to encouraging participation in higher education, acknowledging diversity and promoting equality of opportunity
5. Commitment to continuing professional development and evaluation of their own practice Associate:
Individuals who have demonstrated they have met SD1 may apply for Associate status.
Fellow: Individuals who have demonstrated they have met SD2 may apply for Fellow status.
Senior Fellow: Senior Fellow status recognises outstanding achievement in teaching and enhancing the student learning experience, combined with scholarship and academic leadership, in line with SD3.
The Academy’s criteria for the application of SD3 are:
1. Lead colleagues by personal example
2. Facilitate and influence networks of colleagues
3. Impact positively beyond your institution, at national and international level, within your discipline or more generally
4. Make a sustained contribution and positive impact to the student learning experience
5. Champion learning and teaching in HE